Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Involuntary Hospitalization of S.C.

Supreme Court of West Virginia

September 25, 2017

In re: Involuntary Hospitalization of S.C.

          MEMORANDUM DECISION

         Petitioner S.C., by counsel C. Joan Parker, appeals the November 10, 2016, order of the Mental Hygiene Commissioner of Kanawha County ("Commissioner") committing him to a psychiatric hospital upon a finding of probable cause that petitioner was likely to harm himself or others.[1] The State of West Virginia, by counsel Andrew S. Dornbos, filed its response in support of the Commissioner's order. On appeal, petitioner argues that the Commissioner failed to consider all relevant and reliable evidence before ruling that petitioner was mentally ill, drug addicted, and likely to cause harm to himself or others.

         This Court has considered the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision affirming the Commissioner's order is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

         On November 10, 2016, petitioner's mother filed an "Application for Involuntary Custody for Mental Health Examination." Petitioner's mother stated that she believed petitioner to be addicted to alcohol and mentally ill. The bases for her belief included the facts that petitioner had stopped going to work and "started preparing for the defeat of the government." Petitioner's mother asserted that he had purchased a gun and was having delusions, including one in which he stated that, while driving, "cars magically appeared around [petitioner] and recruited him to work for Trump." She further asserted that petitioner drank beer all day, stopped taking his antidepressant, and was not sleeping or eating.

         On that same date, petitioner was evaluated by James W. Merrill, MA, who filed a "Certificate of Licensed Examiner" after the evaluation. Mr. Merrill found reason to believe that petitioner was mentally ill, addicted, and likely to cause harm to himself due to his mental illness and addiction. Mr. Merrill found that petitioner abused cannabis and alcohol and had, in fact, been arrested for driving under the influence the night before his evaluation. Mr. Merrill also documented that petitioner had stopped taking his antidepressant medication. Mr. Merrill diagnosed petitioner with mood disorder, unspecified; alcohol use disorder; cannabis use disorder; and noncompliance with treatment. Mr. Merrill concluded that petitioner had a "moderate probability of SHB [seriously harmful behavior]" and was in need of "[i]mmediate hospitalization in a 24-hour locked facility[.]"

         Shortly after petitioner's evaluation, a probable cause hearing was held. Mr. Merrill, petitioner's mother, petitioner's sister, and petitioner's fiancé testified in support of involuntary hospitalization. Mr. Merrill testified consistently with the information presented in his "Certificate of Licensed Examiner" and added that he was "concerned about if, in fact, he did buy an assault rifle and he's using drugs and alcohol and may be delusional . . . . That's not a good combination, so."

         Petitioner's mother testified to petitioner's change in behavior and "that it's like there was a disconnect from reality[.]" She testified that petitioner was "defiant and just . . . one of those people that thinks everything is a conspiracy" and that petitioner stated he "had been somewhere and these cars surrounded him and they were recruiting him for Trump." She testified that petitioner's daughter confided in her that "she loves [petitioner] and thinks he needs help but she's starting to be afraid of him" and to be around him. Petitioner's mother was unaware "until yesterday that he smoked pot six days a week, " but she testified that "[i]f [petitioner is] awake he's got a beer in his hand" and that "it's one beer after another."

         Petitioner's sister testified that she saw him a few days prior to the probable cause hearing, "[a]nd he was not himself at all, he was - what I would as manic [sic]." After leaving the home at which she saw petitioner and at which she left her own children to have a sleepover with petitioner's child, she said "I almost turned around and went and got my kids because I was scared, but I didn't. Because I knew they wanted to spend the night with his daughter[.]" She also testified that petitioner had "two large guns that I did see with my eyes, at the house." Petitioner purportedly told her that "he was stockpiled with his stuff for when this happened." Petitioner's sister testified that petitioner has not been to work and simply stopped going:

He didn't tell work he wasn't coming. He just stopped going. And he was so happy to get this job. He's been trying for years to get this job. And he just recently got it and now he just stopped going because of all this stuff, and he didn't tell anybody that he was going to not go.

         Petitioner's sister also recounted that petitioner told her

he was in a high speed chase and that he passed the test. And so he was going to be recruited to work for the government to protect Donald Trump. And that he was just waiting for them to come and get him. And he was so excited. He kept asking people, "Are you in on it?" "Are you in on it?" And we were like "In on what?"

         Petitioner further told her that "when you buy high powered rifles that shot [sic] a mile away, then they know that you're serious and you can protect the government."

         Petitioner's fiancé testified to hearing petitioner talk to himself. She said she "could hear him from the bedroom, it wasn't - I thought somebody was in there with him. And he told me he was just talking to himself[.]" Petitioner's fiancé testified that petitioner purchased a deer rifle and that, at first, she was not concerned about this purchase or his purchase of ammunition. However, she felt that his preparation "started, I think, it just got to the extreme. He said something once that, . . . if it came down to it, . . . he would have to go and . . . defend the country and . . . shoot Hilary [sic], if they needed him to." At this point during the hearing, petitioner interjected and clarified that he told her that he would defend the Constitution of the United States, not that he would shoot Hillary Clinton.

         Petitioner testified on his own behalf. He testified to having recently purchased a new gaming system that has technology that allows him to communicate with other gamers over a headset. He also testified that certain clubs he mentioned joining were retail loyalty clubs for Cabela's and Books-A-Million.

         The Commissioner found that petitioner's testimony explained some of the witnesses' testimony but that "what's going on goes beyond that. When I look at the totality of the testimony, I think there's something going on that needs to be addressed, and that needs to be addressed psychiatrically." Thus, the Commissioner entered her "Order: Probable Cause ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.